Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 06:51

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Xbox sale round-up June 3, 2025 - DLC - TrueAchievements
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Chris Conley announces his retirement - NBC Sports
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
F1 in Spain: Now that was a lapse in judgment - Ars Technica
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What was your biggest culture shock going to Europe?
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What is the cause of the common odor many senior citizens have (despite good hygiene)?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Black Ops 7 - Here Are 58 Screenshots For The Next Call Of Duty - GameSpot